Many oppose the livestreaming of the execution, viewing it as disgusting, cruel, unusual, biased, and a tactic used by autocratic regimes to instill fear.

Some support the livestreaming, believing it could deter others from similar acts and that Hasan, as a military member, is subject to military justice.

Reports indicate President Trump will make the final decision on the livestreaming, with warnings that it could radicalize others.

Many express strong opposition to livestreaming the execution, viewing it as barbaric, sadistic, a form of torture, and a practice of cruel autocracies that America should not adopt.

Some support the idea, believing it could serve as a deterrent for others, while acknowledging the military's desire for such an action.

Geobits report on Trump's deliberation regarding the livestreaming of Nidal Hasan's execution, noting the Pentagon's plan and the warnings from lawmakers and religious leaders.

Geobits provide background on Nidal Hasan's case, including his military justice status and past payments, without directly taking a stance on the livestreaming.

Many condemn the idea of a livestreamed execution, viewing it as a cruel, unusual, and authoritarian act that aligns the US with countries like Iran and North Korea.

Some argue that Nidal Hasan volunteered for military justice and that the penalties under the UCMJ are distinct from civilian law, making it a military matter.

Many condemn the idea of livestreaming an execution, comparing it to practices of authoritarian regimes and questioning its impact on American values.

President Trump states he will make the final decision on whether to livestream Nidal Hasan's execution, acknowledging differing opinions.