Protesters and their supporters condemn the mass detentions, police brutality, and government's attempts to suppress dissent, calling Modi a 'coward' and 'India's shame'.

The Supreme Court has intervened, directing authorities to ensure normal public services, review barricades, and prevent unlawful detentions, emphasizing that protests cannot paralyze the city.

Protesters and CJP leaders condemn the detentions and accuse the Modi government of election fraud, with some calling Modi 'India's shame' and alleging kidnapping.

Lawyers and Delhi officials criticize the protests for paralyzing the city and impeding livelihoods, with the Delhi CM hoping for 'better sense to prevail'.

The UN questions the Delhi detentions, while India dismisses it as 'unwarranted interference', asserting its ability to handle democratic disputes.

The Supreme Court intervenes, directing normal operations for Delhi Metro, reviewing barricades, and ensuring no unlawful detentions, while seeking answers from authorities.

Critics and protest leaders condemn the detentions as an attack on democracy and label Prime Minister Modi as a 'coward' for the crackdown.

The Supreme Court has intervened, seeking answers on mass detentions and metro restrictions, and ordered normal operations for public services while reviewing barricades.

The UN's criticism of the Delhi detentions is met with strong rebuttal from India, which deems it 'unwarranted interference' in its internal affairs.