Reformist voices within Iran call for avoiding war, emphasizing that the survival of Iran is more important than uranium enrichment and nuclear gains.

Some Iranian officials argue that atomic bombs no longer provide deterrence and that Iran lacks sufficient uranium for bomb construction, criticizing a perceived 'illiteracy' in public discourse.

Reformist voices within Iran argue that the country's survival is more important than uranium enrichment and nuclear gains, urging for measures to avoid war.

Some Iranian figures, like Zarif, argue that nuclear bombs no longer offer deterrence and that Iran lacks sufficient uranium for their construction, criticizing a lack of foresight in national strategy.

Critics, like Rouhollah Jomei, accuse certain political factions, such as Jaleeli's current, of promoting a war-centric approach that has imposed heavy costs on Iran.

Reformist voices in Tehran argue that Iran's survival is more important than uranium enrichment and nuclear gains, urging to avoid war.

Some officials, like Zarif, argue that Iran lacks sufficient uranium for an atomic bomb and that nuclear weapons are no longer an effective deterrent, criticizing a 'war-mongering' approach.

Iranian officials criticize US foreign policy, viewing US actions as hostile towards Iran as a whole and demanding respect for Iran's historical and civilizational depth.